What is the legal principle that reduces a judgment when an individual is found partially liable?

The legal principle that reduces a judgment when an individual is found partially liable is known as comparative negligence. This concept allows for the apportionment of liability among multiple parties involved in an incident. Under comparative negligence, if a plaintiff is found to be partially at fault for their injuries or damages, their recovery is reduced in proportion to their degree of fault.

For example, if a court determines that a plaintiff is 30% responsible for their injuries while the defendant is 70% responsible, the plaintiff's compensation would be reduced by 30%. This principle recognizes that both parties may share blame to varying degrees and seeks to create a more equitable resolution by adjusting damages based on the level of responsibility.

Contributory negligence, on the other hand, may bar recovery entirely if the plaintiff is found to have any fault in the incident. Assumption of risk is a defense mechanism where a plaintiff is barred from recovery because they voluntarily accepted the risks associated with a known danger. Vicarious liability refers to the legal responsibility of an employer or principal for the negligent actions of an employee or agent acting within the scope of their employment, but it does not address the apportioning of damages based on the plaintiff's liability.